Independent and not affiliated with the FDA, MHRA, ISPE, PDA, or any agency. Get the appgoutham@madhadi.com
madhadi.comData Integrity & GxP Quality
Browse all topics → Articles Templates & Procedures Learning paths GlossaryScenariosToolsRegulatory ReferencesLearning PathsTopics About Start here
Protocol Plug-and-play starting point Equipment Qualification

Protocol: Compressed Air and Process Gas Qualification

A plug-and-play qualification protocol for product-contact compressed air and process gases: ISO 8573 purity classes and pharmacopeial monographs, point-of-use sampling for oil, dew point, particles and microbial, filter integrity, acceptance criteria, and a filled specimen.

Document type: Protocol

Read and copy the template below into your own quality system. It is a generic starting point for your own internal use, provided as is, with no warranty; see the Terms and License. Adopting it does not by itself create compliance.

This is a ready-to-use qualification protocol for compressed air and process gases that contact product, primary containers, or the product environment. There is no rinse after a nitrogen purge, so whatever the gas carries lands on or in the product. The protocol tests at the point of use, after the final filter, against the right standard, ISO 8573 purity classes for engineering quality, and the pharmacopeial monograph where the gas is itself a defined substance. Replace every <<FILL: ...>> placeholder, read numeric limits off the current standards, and route it through your validation lifecycle. A filled specimen follows. Confirm each cited standard and monograph against the current source before you rely on it.

Approval page

RoleNameSignatureDate
Author (Validation / C&Q)<<FILL>>
Reviewer (Engineering / SME)<<FILL>>
Reviewer (QC)<<FILL>>
Approver (Quality Assurance)<<FILL>>
FieldEntry
Protocol number<<FILL: e.g. QUAL-GAS-001>>
Version<<FILL>>
Gas / system<<FILL: e.g. compressed air, nitrogen>>
Use (contact type)<<FILL: e.g. overlay of open product, vial purge>>

1. Objective

Demonstrate that the gas system delivers, at every product-contact point of use, gas that meets its defined quality: the ISO 8573 purity classes for oil, water (dew point), and particles, plus microbial control, and, where the gas is a pharmacopeial substance, the identity and purity of its monograph. Prove that point-of-use sterilizing filters are integrity-testable and that the system holds dew point and pressure across the demand range.

2. Scope

Covers the generation and treatment train, distribution, and the product-contact points of use in Attachment A for <<FILL: gas>>. Black-utility uses of the same gas (for example valve actuation) are out of scope and are commissioned only. State which regime applies:

  • Gas contacts product as a defined gaseous substance (for example pharmaceutical-grade nitrogen) -> pharmacopeial monograph plus a microbial/particle/oil control regime appropriate to the contact.
  • Gas contacts product surfaces or environment but is not itself a monograph substance -> ISO 8573 purity classes plus microbial control.

3. System description

<<FILL: describe the compressor type (oil-free, or oil-lubricated with coalescing/carbon filtration), dryers (desiccant/refrigerant) and target dew point, point-of-use sterilizing filters (for example 0.22 micron hydrophobic membrane, integrity-testable housing), sample ports, and instrumentation (dew point transmitters, pressure).>>

4. Prerequisites

  • URS and risk assessment approved; the applicable quality regime (ISO 8573 classes and/or monograph) defined.
  • Commissioning complete; filters installed.
  • Instruments calibrated and traceable (dew point, particle counter, pressure; gas analysis methods available and validated).

5. Acceptance criteria (system level)

Every product-contact point of use meets the acceptance table in section 7 across the sampling study; point-of-use filters are integrity-testable and pass; the system holds dew point and pressure across the demand range; all deviations closed.

6. IQ / OQ highlights

IDVerificationExpected resultResult
IQ-01Treatment train installed as designedCompressor, dryers, filters, and instruments match the P&ID and URS<<FILL>>
IQ-02Sterilizing filter housings integrity-testableHousing design allows in-situ integrity testing<<FILL>>
OQ-01Dew point held across demandPressure dew point stays within <<FILL: ISO 8573 class from standard>> across the demand range<<FILL>>
OQ-02Filter integrity testPoint-of-use filter passes bubble point / pressure-hold per the filter specification<<FILL>>
OQ-03Dryer regeneration and alarmsDryers regenerate; dew-point alarm functions<<FILL>>

7. PQ sampling study and acceptance table

Sample at the worst-case point of use (farthest from treatment or highest demand), after the final filter, in the actual fitting. Run an intensive phase, then routine monitoring at a justified frequency; dew point is usually monitored continuously, oil and microbial periodically.

AttributeStandard / methodAcceptance limitResultVerdict
Identity / purity (monograph gases)USP / Ph. Eur. gas monograph<<FILL: per monograph>><<FILL>><<FILL>>
Oil (total: aerosol and vapor)ISO 8573-2 / ISO 8573-5<<FILL: ISO 8573-1 oil class, e.g. Class 1>><<FILL>><<FILL>>
Water / pressure dew pointISO 8573-1 (transmitter + reference check)<<FILL: dew point class, below the lowest line temperature>><<FILL>><<FILL>>
ParticlesISO 8573-4<<FILL: ISO 8573-1 particle class>><<FILL>><<FILL>>
MicrobialISO 8573-7 / site limit<<FILL: site action limit>><<FILL>><<FILL>>

Cite a gas quality as the ISO triplet, for example “ISO 8573-1:2010 Class 1.2.1” (oil Class 1, water Class 2, particles Class 1). Take each class threshold from the current ISO 8573-1 table.

8. Deviation handling

Record each discrepancy as a numbered deviation, assess impact, resolve, and re-test. QA approves each deviation and the final disposition.

9. Summary and conclusion

FieldEntry
Points of use qualified<<FILL>>
Attributes passed / failed<<FILL>>
Filter integrity result<<FILL>>
Deviations raised / closed<<FILL>>
Conclusion<<FILL>>
Approved by (QA)<<FILL: name, signature, date>>

10. References

ISO 8573-1 (purity classes) and the companion parts: ISO 8573-2 and -4 (oil aerosol and particles), -5 (oil vapor), -7 (viable microbial contaminant). USP / Ph. Eur. monographs for the relevant gas (for example Nitrogen, Oxygen, Carbon Dioxide). EU GMP Annex 1 (2022); 21 CFR 211.46, 211.63, 211.67. Related reading: clean utilities qualification, bioburden and endotoxin testing.

Confirm the current version and clause numbers of each reference before issue.

11. Revision history

VersionDateAuthorSummary of change
<<FILL: 1.0>><<FILL>><<FILL>>Initial issue.

Filled specimen

The following shows a completed PQ acceptance table for an example nitrogen used to overlay open product, so you can see how the two-regime approach reads. The values are illustrative; take real limits from the current standards.

AttributeStandard / methodAcceptance limitResultVerdict
Identity / purityPh. Eur. Nitrogen monographper monograph99.9% N2Pass
Oil (total)ISO 8573-1 oil Class 1per Class 1 oil limitwithin Class 1Pass
Water (pressure dew point)ISO 8573-1 Class 2per Class 2 dew pointwithin Class 2Pass
ParticlesISO 8573-1 Class 1per Class 1 tablewithin Class 1Pass
MicrobialISO 8573-7 / site limit<= 1 CFU/m3 (site action)0 CFU/m3Pass

In this example the nitrogen was held to both its pharmacopeial monograph (identity and purity, because it is a defined gaseous substance in contact with product) and the ISO 8573 purity classes plus microbial control. A common failed protocol tests oil aerosol but not oil vapor, or assumes dry gas is sterile and omits the ISO 8573-7 microbial sample. Testing total oil and running a microbial sample at the point of use is what closes those gaps.

Common inspection findings this protocol prevents

  • Point-of-use sterilizing filter changed on a schedule but never integrity tested.
  • Pressure dew point set above the line temperature, so water condenses and organisms grow.
  • Oil-lubricated compressor feeding product-contact gas with only aerosol oil tested, not vapor.
  • The wrong standard cited (a monograph where ISO 8573 was needed, or vice versa).
  • Sampling at the receiver instead of the point of use after the final filter.

How to adapt this protocol

  1. Set your protocol number, gas, and contact type on the approval page, and state which quality regime applies.
  2. Read the ISO 8573 class thresholds and monograph limits off the current standards; do not carry remembered numbers.
  3. List the real product-contact points of use and the worst-case selection in Attachment A.
  4. Include the point-of-use filter integrity test and its schedule.
  5. Confirm every standard and monograph against the current published version before issue.
Use madhadi.com as an app Full screen, works offline, one tap from your home screen.